Saturday, April 28, 2007

Fatigué.

Pendant qu'il est, je suis fatigué des choses qui se produisent dans mon environnement professionnel. Là tellement politicking. Toute la lutte de puissance. Elle est juste pas je. J'ai commuté la carrière. J'ai laissé le choeur. Je suis parti de l'église. J'ai dit au revoir à toutes choses parce que j'ai voulu un endroit que je puisse être parti de ces choses. J'ai pensé que je les laissais pour un monde de l'innocence. J'ai réalisé que j'étais s'échapper juste. S'échapper n'est ainsi pas la réponse.

Maintenant j'essayerai et manipulerai la situation en étant de qui j'ai besoin pour être afin de prospérer, survivre pas simplement dans cet endroit trompeur particulier. Peut-être je peux me lever au-dessus de lui et alors finalement partir pour un endroit plus véritable.

Mais cette fois, je tâcherai de me lever au-dessus de lui et de l'évasion non simplement il.

Post-scriptum. Ce non français. C'est juste mon rant.

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Sympathy - Paul Laurence Dunbar

"I know why the caged bird sings, ah me,

When his wing is bruised and his bosom sore,

When he beats his bars and would be free;

It is not a carol of joy or glee,

But a prayer that he sends from his heart's deep core,

But a plea, that upward to Heaven he flings –

I know why the caged bird sings.

Leisure - W. H. Davies

WHAT is this life if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare?

No time to stand beneath the boughs,
And stare as long as sheep and cows:

No time to see, when woods we pass,
Where squirrels hide their nuts in grass:

No time to see, in broad daylight,
Streams full of stars, like skies at night:

No time to turn at Beauty's glance,
And watch her feet, how they can dance:

No time to wait till her mouth can
Enrich that smile her eyes began?

A poor life this if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare.

Monday, April 23, 2007

Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew questions homosexuality ban.

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Singapore's powerful former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew, acknowledging the view that some people are genetically destined to be homosexual, has questioned the city-state's ban on sex between men.

"If in fact it is true, and I have asked doctors this, that you are genetically born a homosexual -- because that's the nature of the genetic random transmission of genes -- you can't help it. So why should we criminalize it?" Monday's Straits Times, a pro-government daily, quoted Lee as saying.

Under Singapore law, a man who is found to have committed an act of "gross indecency" with another man can be jailed for up to two years, though prosecutions are rare.

But Lee -- who remains the most powerful minister in the cabinet of his son, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong -- said Singapore should not actively pursue homosexuals who engage in sex.

Lee said that while homosexuality was not widely accepted in Singapore, authorities must take a pragmatic approach.

"Let's not go around like this moral police ... barging into people's rooms. That's not our business," he told a weekend meeting with the youth wing of the People's Action Party, Singapore's ruling political party.

In November, the Ministry of Home Affairs said it was considering decriminalizing oral and anal sex between consenting heterosexual adults, but not between homosexuals.

The authorities have banned gay festivals and censored gay films, saying homosexuality should not be advocated as a lifestyle. But, despite the official ban on gay sex, Singapore has a thriving gay scene.

Lee's comments come at a time when many groups, such as Singapore's Law Society, are clamoring for a review of the laws against homosexual sex, which they view as outdated and archaic.

Friday, April 6, 2007

Dressed For Success!

During a recent meeting, the boss said to his staff, “we must all dress professionally” and “we must project an image of professionalism”. Tossing the ethos of “looking beyond skin deep” that is tossed out of his Mouth Of Perpetual Religiosity, he has decided that even if you are involve in heavily physical activities (where I will not elaborate the denotation), it does not appear appropriate to be dressed in sporting attire through out the whole working day. There was also mention of the disfavour for wearing slippers around the ‘professional compound’.

Then comes the cruncher – he tried to give an analogy. “Imagine if you are working in an office in the Business District, would you put on such attire if you are working there?”

Well sir, if I may (in fact, I should), WHEN I was working in an office in the Business District, I HAD to put on my full working attire. It was not so much to project a so-called ‘professional image’ but rather out of climatic necessity! The temperature in the offices qualifies an entire weather system of its own. Within those walls of eternal frosted glass, we were just TWO MUFFLERS AND A SCARF SHORT OF A FULL-BLOWN WINTER!

With regards to his concern about slippers versus professionalism, I had wanted to reassure him that over 80% or more of the total office population slips in to slippers or flip-flops the moment they arrive at their desks or cubicles. Besides, it has been proven that PERSONAL COMFORT AND EFFECTIVE PRODUCTIVITY RIDES A TANDEM IN THE PARK.

MY DEAR SIR (or madam, as the case, I suspect might be), the argument you tried to qualify with your comparison between my current profession and the “Business District” crowd falls flat. It fails for one tiny detail – COMPLETE CLIMATE CONTROL (or some might say a different climatic zone, i.e. polar). Please allow me to assure you that if you can provide such a working environment in every office, passageway and most importantly, even the rooms where we spend most of our time with our pediatric stakeholders, I swear, on any entity of your desire and choosing, to whip out my entire collection of Ralph Lauren, Dolce et Gabbana and Issey Miyake winter wear collection and wear them with such zeal, fervour and enthusiasm that some might start to regard it my religion or calling to match your Mouth of Perpetual Religiosity. I will conjure up the famous “International Fashion Week” and make it happen 52 times a year.

I say not in jest.

But first must come climate conditions ala “The Day After Tomorrow”.

Wednesday, April 4, 2007

Anne, wait for me...

I am coming to get you...And to my Dar-bleu...
thanks for accompanying me
through my Uni days.

They were magic,
there was music,
they were a daze.

Sunday, April 1, 2007

The Understanding.

She finally succumbs to cancer. She has been fighting it for the past 2 years. The combination of prescribed chemotherapy and a self-administered herbal-organic-macrobiotic diet has apparently not helped in any way.

He receives an SMS which says she’s passed away. He does not feel anything. After all, he does not know her in the strictest sense of the word. They are related, yes, but they do not know each other.

The only things they share are, perhaps a family name and a common gene pool.

He tries to remember her. He sits at a café and tries to conjure up memories of her face.

The image draws up featureless.

He tries to recall the ring of her voice, the sonorous tone in her pitching.

The sound registers a vacuous silence.

In his mind, she has no gait, no height, no breadth. There is no depth of her in his memory. In his comprehension of the world around him, she exists as a relation in oral form. Someone tells him before he is of age that is who she is to him and he pays lip service. There are no strings attached to the acknowledgement. It’s just a gesture of convenience to humor convention and appease the elders. Outside of that, there is no passion, no conviction. Over the years, the words still resounds at meetings, but the ring is empty and meaningless. A term of acknowledgement more out of convenience and also because he is so used to it, so ingrained, anything else is both strange and awkward.

So he went on with the masquerade.

As he recalls all these memories, there are still no emotions to evoke, no deeply buried feelings to find that he can use to summon a tear or even a twitch in his eyes or the corner of his mouth. There are not even superficial feelings to speak of.


They knew she was dying. The doctors confirm that she is in the final stages of the progress of the malignant cells.

They take their time to meander their way to the hospice.

Her siblings arrive too late.

However, they will put on a show, keep up appearances. Once again living up to convention to appease the elders – they will weep, they will cry, they will wail at the prompt of the caretaking priest. But their wet tears carry no emotions; their sonorous wails cry no feelings. Just expected production of social practices.

A family who has lost a member should grieve, so they shall, even to show the neighbours, the other relatives.

But they also show out of fear – while living they had ignored her, avoiding her like the pestilence she is and carries. When dead they fear her haunted pestering. They will do all things, spiritual or physical to prevent her return in spectral form – real or imaginary.

They will put up a show – for the viewing pleasure of others, for the sanity of their own mind.

They had done it for their parents – father and mother whose lives produced them, why not for a sibling? One who merely shares a family and a common gene pool.

After all, they have not chosen to know her. They had not even chosen to be related. They most certainly did not choose to be born – to the best of their understanding, their existence is merely a result of a chance meeting between two distant entities whose gene pools created them.


As he tries to recall all his memories of her in vain, drawing a blank, he comes to realize that he has been thinking of the whole experience in third person. He is apart from the whole incident. It is a non-event to him.

He finally understands, in sickness and in health, she has been dead to him far longer than he cares to remember.